triogate.blogg.se

1. ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 SKIN
2. ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 ANDROID
3. ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 TRIAL
4. ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 PROFESSIONAL

ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 TRIAL

Ended up being a LOT of extra work, trial and error. Trial and error showed that we also had to minimize the functionality/interaction originally used in the PC/laptop version in order for the mobile version to interact and display correctly. After creating hundreds of OLTs optimized for PC/laptop, we had to create duplicate modules that were optimized for tablet/smartphone. We didn't realize when we decided to purchase Storyline over Captivate that it was more optimized to iOS than Android.

ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 ANDROID

Hey there! My previous organization purchased Storyline late last year and found it easier to use than Captivate, but 85% of our users want to access our online training modules via their Android tablets and smartphones.

We want to make sure that we invest in an evolving platform. I want to know if there will be another version of Storyline in say. Future StoryLine releases: We like to be on the cutting edge of eLearning development.However, the dont offer skins for Storyline.

ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 SKIN

In the past we purchased the skin from eLearning brothers.

However, we have 20K+ learners in India where Andriod is very popular. HTML5 for Android: Today, Storyline output works on iPad (and works well I must say).The answers to the questions below will help us make our decision: In the next 6 months we are looking to grow the eLearning team and hence want to standardize on one tool. We really like Articulate and 90% of our content has been built in Articulate tools (though we have eLearning Suite too). I would never suggest it proves anything other than that I have an opinion.We are looking to strategically invest in tools from one company. But that's a subjective opinion based on my own experience. I like both, and have used both, but prefer Captivate if given a choice.

ARTICULATE STORYLINE VS ADOBE CAPTIVATE 9 PROFESSIONAL

Many organisations where I work here in Australia are quite willing for the e-learning developer to use either tool, as long as the output meets their corporate standards for branding and works seamlessly with their LMS.Īs a professional e-learning developer who works under contract to different organisations every few months, I am required to know and use both of these tools. I really don't see this entire argument about authoring tools to be mutually exclusive. But some of these same companies that once said they would ONLY use Storyline are now asking me to use Captivate instead. PPT users found its UI more naturally 'intuitive' than Captivate. But they just don't get much airplay anymore.Īs to whether Captivate is losing ground: When Storyline first came on the scene it won a lot of fans because of its ease of use and similarities to PowerPoint. I know these tools still exist out in the market. What I DO notice is that while Captivate and Storyline are both considered as standard industry tools nowadays, almost NO jobs I see are ever mentioning authoring tools like Lectora or others that in previous eras were considered to be standards. I am also seeing lots of job offers that specify either Captivate OR Storyline experience will be favourably considered. However, I don't think this fact can be strictly translated as a sign that "Captivate is losing its foothold". Here in Australia I have also noticed that Storyline gets mentioned.